THE PLIGHT OF THE ERRONEOUS
The present write-up
painfully summarizes the abject inadequacy among modern graduates and
Post-graduates emerging from several parts of Tamil Nadu. My reference to this
province gains significance, because this territory in South India has had a
tradition of immaculate usage of LANGUAGES INCLUDING English in the first
quarter century in the history of independent India. Where have we lost this
pristine glory is a lamentation by all elders.
Well, as of now, every
situation looms as a plight. Some people advocate the concept of ‘positivity’
in our outlook and approach. It reads healthy with a passive suggestion of
‘self correction’ along the course. But what baffles me is the suggested
positivity on the face of inept equipping and callous indifference to the
process of learning. Unfailingly it leads to a state of misconstrued
opinionating to the extent of bruising cordial friendship among persons of
comparable parity of age and levels of study. To me it tends to rake-up a sense
of alienation between the mentally ‘haves’ and the have-nots’. Ironically, the
latter assume greater wisdom upon themselves, they being more opinionated than they
are truly apprised. The malady seems to get entrenched in the society faster
largely by callous indifference to appropriate learning and the ever expanding
population of incompetent handlers of the languages. The concern expressed here
pertains to abuse of the languages with near gay abandon.
The steadfast adherence
to such ‘wrong conception, is based on an excuse “someone said so”. To me
it looks a defence, if not defiance. Honestly it is appalling rather than
appealing to be a way out. I can bring to the discussion a number of situations
where persons make utterances that would not manage safe passage among native
monolingual speakers.
The spirit of the
suggestion is to fore-warn such deficient minds to get appropriately equipped
before any native speaker chooses to dress their ego down to a point of shame,
leaving them ‘bare’ with fangs of
wounded vanity. Even among non native speakers, the discerning do not pardon the
defiance backed up by emboldened arrogance borne out of numerical frequency of
their lot. Being in the bracket of ill- conceived, idiocy is a syndrome that
amplifies such defects elevating their status to that of a butt of ridicule. The
worst form of defending the defective handling of languages is to baffle the opponent
saying that this is the modern way, while yours is the old form. Painfully the
truth is – a thing has been wrongly learnt recently; so it is the “modern way”.
I readily brush them aside saying “any defective equipment however new is a
liability”. Look at the following:
Amongst our ‘butts of
ridicule’ the terms ‘improve and
‘improvise’ figure liberally as ‘interchangeable’
while in reality they are unrelated. Another inadequacy among them is to wrongly
insert ‘continue’ in place of ‘continuous’
in the course of a conversation with an
unfailing alacrity of conservation of jarring error. Quite some assumptions dominate
their minds while framing statement; terms are wrongly employed on the belief
of their assumed meaning though they spell like near cousins. For example similar terms oppose/ appose, Judicial / judicious,
ludicrous / luscious, Diffuse / Defuse, Climatic / Climactic, Desert/Dessert,
Principle/ Principal, to/ too etc. look alike but their meanings refer to
different items. It is probable that children in their formative days are not groomed
well to grasp the essential basics and the difference between verb /adverb and
adjectives. In later life, these boys and girls feel it insecure to interact
among contemporary learners and they turn mute in the company of those who are
adept in the nuances of language. By the time they are at higher levels of
study, ego forbids their seeking clarification; instead, they choose to put on
airs of confidence and try to silence critics with fragile and futile defence
of taking refuge under “modern pattern of usage”. Seldom do they realize how badly
they are judged for their inadequacy on all occasions of quality judgment. It is not my endeavour to portray them in bad
light; but often they do not heed well-meant directives and unfailingly
irritate those who iterate their flaws. Well before they are ready to launch
themselves into the ocean of competition, they would get drowned by the mass of
their ego unless they disband it to unburden themselves and acquire the virtue
of listening to sensible suggestion instead of being sensitive. Sensibility
should always take precedence over
sensitivity
K . RAMAN 02-07-2020