TUITION
From one of contemptuous status, if an act has assumed
significance of contemporary value, it is Tuition. It is an elegant game of playing
on the nerves of the ‘consumer’ to his or her ultimate tolerance by mind and
money. I am reminded of our days in
school. It was the ‘surest Sin’ to undertake or undergo tuition. Any boy or
girl who had real cognitive inadequacy alone was deemed eligible to receive
coaching – more as an exercise of systematizing the learner by devoting time to
learn under the immediate supervision of a teacher. Those days teachers were
not too inclined to undertake such work and generally used to ‘discourage’ the
parents from trying to put the ward on coaching. Also, they would readily offer
to help the boy/ girl for any clarification in the lunch hour, instead of
‘reading’ an opportunity to make an income. Certainly, the then teachers were
in financial penury, but rich in abilities to teach. Honestly, they would take
it an insult if his /her ward were to be given ‘extra-coaching’ implying that
the teacher was not effective in his/her classroom effort.
There is a huge shift in trends. Is it a paradigm shift?
Really, I find it hard to decipher as to what drives the teacher-taught
ensemble to readily settle for ‘tuitions’ right from second standard onwards.
None feels it shameful to be under a round the clock vigil of some teacher or
the other. Many people are driven by mass-psychology and fear that my
child would be left alone, unless put through the same exercise of
being at school or tuition except for hours of sleep. Tuition teachers are very
smart. They make the student attend to all home work in tuition teacher’s home,
with no complaints from school of the student’s default to such assignments.
Parents are effectively silenced and the teacher profitably engages self. What
an arrangement is this? Parents tell
their neighbours, ”after putting him/her to tuition, [s]he has become
systematic and has no time to TV or friends”. They seldom realize that all his mates are in the same place most of
the time continuing with their schedules as ever except that they do not carry
‘dues’ on home work.
It is a marginal gain for the ward to have picked the habit
of doing assignment work in time. But, does the cost input over a tuition justify
the returns thereof? Beside the inadequate or disproportionate input to output
equation, a psychological uncertainty gets unleashed in the minds of learners.
They get to develop a fear that “unless tutored, I may not be able to learn
anything on my own”. Undoubtedly, it is the most undesirable state of mind for
youth; inadvertently, the boy/girl assume that they must receive’ personal
guidance’ from teachers. The basic ability to distinguish right from wrong and
other approaches of ‘associational learning’ and the strategies of using those
skills get weakened and murky as age advances. Never for a moment imagine that
‘the merit’ of a person is related to the sore[s]he achieves in examinations.
Many students who were ‘less promising’ in early part of life reach the zenith
of skill –as most of them are late
bloomers. Have you heard of ‘gold medalists’ making a mark in their life in
office or family? They score high in examinations but not in life. Provide for
child’s all round development instead of ‘targeting the child’ to what you
consider supreme. World is a huge stage full of opportunity for those
who play their game by instinct and do not look around for instructions from
coach or tutor.
Prof. K. Raman
You have rightly pointed out that only cognitive inadequacy students go in for tution in the past. But today to get more marks parents compel their wards to attend tution classes. There are teachers who earn a lot and do not show their income for IT assessment.
ReplyDeleteSome send their wards studying in schools to tution centre hoping they would get seat in IIT or medical courses.
Tution becomes a necessary evil nowadays.
K.Venkataraman
Nice article, bringing out the stark reality of today's tution culture.
ReplyDelete