IS INDIAN EDUCATION BAD?
Too often people would nod in
the affirmative, though they would not be able to substantiate or make
plausible arguments thereof. Yet, they would be eagerly ready to chide our
system of education. Some of them have their son or daughter in the software
industry / biotech firm making designed drugs or in some University as a
faculty in bio-medical engineering or Asia-Pacific geopolitical studies or a
practising physician in Brooklyn or Massachusetts, not to ignore high tech
positions in NASA by the way. Any or all these are high in the list of Asian
candidates predominantly of Indians and only next to the Chinese. Let us
consider as to why are we unhappy ourselves of our education. Understandably,
we succumb to popular notions fielded liberally in the marketplace or parks or
temple corridors, where some elder-looking citizens sow such seeds of
disenchantment borne out of some misadventure in their life. The age of the
person confers ‘erudition’ on to the [wo] man.
Leaving aside such ‘make
believe’ efforts, let us try to understand the system of education, in our
country and what one needs to look for a critical appraisal instead of
hearsay interpretations. Ours is
different from that of what the West practices.
Though ours is criticized as a
brain child of MACAULEY, as of generating a local task force to suit the then
British needs in India, we can take note of its formal format different from
that of traditional learning in the Indian context. What was oriented towards
religious format for learning languages and its application through Astronomy,
Astrology and the related mathematical regulations there in, the formal
learning in schools was organized so as to develop connections with other
cultural outfits through ‘language- based’ interactions, highly formalized and
modeled on British lines. But, for ages we have had the recitation-learning of
multiplication tables. The process was a
systematic daily exercise in the morning and in the evening respectively before
opening and closing sessions. By repetitive utterance, pupils got into the
habit of correct data retention. From primary level other subject territories
of History, Geography Science and Civics were taught making the process of
learning more comprehensive instead of being rigidly compartmentalized.
Learning languages is continued through Graduation studies, though for
graduation, a specific subject is learnt as the major item.
Though specializing in a ‘major
subject’, students learn contiguous territories as Ancillary or subsidiary
subjects. This provides the necessary support in augmenting ideas about
interrelationships among interactive knowledge territories. It is here that the
Indian system makes learning more comprehensive and largely self-reliant, as
every graduate has a sound base in Mathematics, related fields, English for liberal
exchange of ideas. So, our graduates are ‘broad-based’ in study and
application. This puts them in a state of advantage in pursuing Post-Graduate
study and also smooth-sail into research.
Indian students from even average
institutions/ Universities are ‘easy-fitting’ in research domains because they
are fairly well –trained in calculations and formulations of required dosage of
chemicals or enzymes for higher-level research. They are not baffled by
language or tabulation of data / statistical data analysis having had a general
balanced training in these domains.
It is not my mission to say
that ours is the best. But, we do have to develop a sense of equanimity to
ascertain facts of reality. At the same time it is not fair to speak ill of our
training system. Whoever raises the bogey of odd comparison with the West, let
me politely remind you of the need to compare cost input if you wish quality
parity. All our Universities are not financially sound with serious crunch for
resources. Yet, we manage to deliver reasonable training and the
correct orientation whereby our girls and boys learn to learn in any
ambience and readily grasp the need to reorganize thought and effort to live up
to.
Ask yourselves the question: If
our education system is no good, why would any Western university or research
lab recruit our youth in their prestigious projects? How many of our Doctors
are holding high profile responsibilities across the globe? Is it not a fact
that teachers from India are among the sought after in US, UK, Australia and
Germany? Are we not a proud Nation to have spontaneously extended the arm of
warmth through Anti-CoVid medication and timely release of Vaccines? Obviously,
our system of education cannot be bad if the indices of global acceptance are
any indication. Remember –our cost effective Satellite-launch schemes float the
satellites for any nation at the orbit of their choice. So, ours cannot be an
arbitrary deal- right? Anything Indian need not be bad; we are flexible and
adaptive to realities.
Prof. K. Raman
Let me first accept that our system of education is not at all bad. Sending their wards to foreign countries is only a mania born out of richness. Memorising is the basic of our Indian education which is a taboo in foreign countries.
ReplyDeleteIn our early days we memorise tables in maths but calculator is a must to multiply 2 into 2 for the present day students. Especially in maths memorising is a must to know many theorems.In all subjects basic things are to be memorised.
Memorising activates the brain.
Our system of education is multi directional whereas foreign education is monodirectional.
K.Venkataraman
Well written article on the Indian Educational system. As you have rightly pointed out we face financial crunch, where as foreign universities make a business out of education. Indian students are well placed to adopt to any environment.
ReplyDelete