LEARNER ETHICS-4
[A silent process of shaping-2].
In the previous piece,
I had indicated that in a learning exercise, teacher –learner interaction can
take proportions of ‘infection’. There are reasons as to why I try to relate
the event to one of ‘infection’.
Any infection requires a compatible host ['susceptible" in medical parlance]. Also, some proximity determines the scope for infection. [the host lends self to the infecting potential of the donor] I do not mean to suggest that the donor in a learning interaction is a pathogen.
The analogy is relevant
only to the similarities known between a host and a donor; the efficacy of
infection requires proximity and compatibility.
In a teacher –learner
interaction, the proximity is of a mental nature in that the learner keenly
receives the information. The willingness of a learner to receive information
is the ‘compatibility factor’ in the process.
However, there are
typical characteristics that drive the teacher-learner compatibility in
enhancing the ‘proximity’ element.
Is it possible that
learners develop proximity with the teacher?
The term ‘proximity’ as
used in the context of, teacher-learner interaction is one of mental closeness
such that learners readily grasp the idea presented by a teacher. For such
‘proximity’ to come by, the teacher has to devise the right approach that can
foist ‘mental nearness’.
What is the strategy
behind ‘mental proximity’?
Any day , the teacher
has to acquire the image of being purposeful and effective; this would mean
that [s]he has to keep tuning self to suit the general mind set of the audience
in his/her classroom.
Students always
represent a spectrum. Each class is a spectrum by itself. So, the different
sets of students in different batches still uniformly accept the efficacy of
specific teachers while revealing a different attitude to some other teachers
in the same institution. This is the crux that teachers must understand in
re-tuning their effort to ‘reach’ the learners.
Why re-tuning is called
for?
Human minds are
conditioned by a set of factors like domestic back-ground, schooling, earlier
practices in learning. Therefore, every batch of learners is a new setting and
experience. Just as one key cannot fit all locks, the same style of speech may
not reach all minds. Ultimately, reaching the minds- is ‘teaching’.
It is not merely
speaking out what one knows, but to make others know what the item is. By,
recasting an idea in different forms, more members get to know the information.
These efforts gradually infuse a sense of developing a mental proximity with
the teacher. Thus teachers can try to help the learner to recognize the
advantage of attentive learning.
To continue…..
The infection analogy is apt
ReplyDeleteUsually the learner who is infected by the qualities of the teacher right from the primary class. Remember a child always adores the teacher beyond its parents. Teacher 's word id வேத வாக்கு for the child.
ReplyDeleteSo it is the teacher who has to be very much guarded in his approach and attitude so that the learners is infected for better .