PHOTOGRAPHY- 14
Light source
Quite relevant it is to forewarn beginners of the
impending damage to picture quality from indiscriminate use or choice of light.
This caution tries to ‘restrict’ use of any light, especially for colour photos
; light sources ought to be understood for their energy expressed in Kelvin
units or Kelvin degrees. Kelvin values above 5600 are closer to daylight in
their spectral component and values below 4500 tend to throw more reddish
wavelengths that show off as colour tint not easy to visually accept. All my
observations in this regard pertain to Film and honestly I have no idea as to
how the situation is handled by Digital scheme of Photography.
Kelvin ratings at or around 6000 are more towards the
blue end of the spoectrum- meaning that It simulates mid- day Sunlight; so
colour values received by camera nearly match our perception of tints in day
light by human brain. On the contrary, values of Kelvin at or below 4000 are
unbearably reddish in spectral component and quite some compensation by
filtration is essential[use of strong blue filteris advised[. Why use
undesirable light and attempt correction?
It was a learned borrowing[ using of balancing
filters] from cinematographers who may
have to shuttle between out door and indoor sequences on the same film stock.Even
then the most astute among Cinematographers finish indoor needs before moving
to out door and vice-versa with due change of appropriate film in place.
Well established Cinematographers could command the
right film for use or could abstain from further work on that project citing
the ground that “my name/our names is/are at stake[s]and cannot afford to lose
label of expertise by compromising on filmstock”. They were well within the domain
of fairplay because , any use of improper match like light on studios and film
characteristic like response to spectral behaviour of light is bound to destroy
image quality. So, friends , let us recognize that film manufacturers used
market films T [BALANCED FOR TUNGSTEN inside studios =LOW KELVIN ] and
D[BALANCED FOR DAYLIGHT OR HIGHER KELVIN typical of outdoor midnoon light ].
Wrong film in improper light conditions would bring off bizarre colours ,
bluish shadows , reddish brown hair colour and so on. Any movie-goer would
rightaway fix it on the Cinematographer[s] though it was the moviemaker who
failed to provide the right kind of film for work [or as in some strange
situations the cinematographer hesitated to ask for right film , fearing the
prospect of losing the assignment].In such situations balancing filters cannot
ensure complete justice to colour rendition. For technical perfection ‘some
light is no light ‘ is the watchword.The higher degree of success in colour
rendition among later Indian movies was in large measure due to trained
technicians brought out through Film Technology institutions that fed them with sound foundations on
LIGHT-FILM- PROCESS relationship + Typical characteristics of FILM BRANDS + THE
CODES on them signifying their adaptability to situations. Thus, the industry
could bring off movies at par with West in cinematography though widely
constrained by ‘not-too –upto-date movie Cameras’.
STILL CAMERAS
Vs LIGHT BALANCING
Still photography too requires a set of lIghting gadgets
like lamps kept in right orientation to privide general lighting as in photo
studios, in addition to 1 or more lights –Key and Fill-in. These were good
enough to help Black and White portraiture. With the advent of colour as the
lone medium of image recording , these lights turned irrelevant by their Kelvin
values [low end].
Special high Kelvin lamps are installed to handle
light requirements for coour work. Curiously all through the history of Amateur
photography, light quality in terms of Kelvin has always been a comfort zone in
that Flash lights for Cameras throw up light valued at 5500-6000 Ko providing
a blue-rich beam of light to safeguard colour characteristics of images as well
as spectral requirements of Amateur colur films[unless specified otherwise by
film manufacturer.] However in using Flash light overcertain distance can prove
to be a menacem especially with lenses Tele/ Zoom. Both are capable of drawing
the image closer from objects at a distance. I.E., THE IMAGE LOOKS LARGER
,THOUGH OBJECTS ARE PHYSICALLY AWAY . It means that the beam of light intended
to light up image details may turn weak before reaching the object [due to
distance] This is ecause , light /intensityof it is governed by”Inverse Square Law”
Inversw square Iaw prescribes that
The physical quantum of light received on a surface is inverely
proportional to the square f the distance.
Consider 2 objects at 2 places [distance X] and
[distance 2X]
While object at X receives light of some intensity,
that at 2X receives only ¼ of what is received at X, due to ‘fall off’ effect.
So, while using special optics designed to magnify image, care to send in
extralight is a logical need.
To continue
K.Raman
In photo studios Cameras are used to take still photographs. (I mean the old version of Cameras with bulloughs)
ReplyDeleteCan’t we use SLR or TLR cameras to take still photos?
Venkataraman
Very informative article.👍
ReplyDeleteSure SLR, TLR can be used. Old timers preferred larger format film
ReplyDeleteK
Raman