Peculiarities- II
English tenses
I do not suggest that
English tenses up the learner. Strangely, the indicator of time / period is
referred to as Tense. Truly, learners grow tense while using the appropriate
verb which fits the time frame –‘Present, Future, Past, Past participle.
For some, this is
another nervous zone, for the language
has intricate structuring of tenses. For instance, students are taught [to
begin with] that adding ‘D’OR ‘ED’ to a present tense verb would express the
past tense as in several cases
LIVE - LIVED
JUMP- JUMPED WORK
- WORKED KILL – KILLED
Using such examples
teachers make it appear that English grammar is the easiest under the Sun. [In
our student days teachers would make us stand in the noon Sun if we do not
properly use tenses. It was ‘under the Sun’ phobia that drove grammar into us].
However, a number of students used to cling on to the use of ‘D’ or ‘ED’ and
wrote ‘WRITED’ [WROTE] EATED [ATE] SHOOTED [SHOT] from the
oversimplification by some lazy teachers. However, there were some quite serious
teachers who would impress up on learners the wide variants thereof, as in TAKE
TOOK TAKEN and GET GOT GOT [THE BRITISH STYLE]. The Americans
brought in GOTTEN as the Past Participle of GET, AS IF THE LANGUAGE IS FREE OF
CONFUSIONS. Other examples are SIT, SAT, SAT EAT, ATE, EATEN, WRITE, WROTE WRITTEN, RUN RAN, RUN. MEET, MET, MET.
There is no uniformity in formulation of words for tenses. It is enough if we remember that the pattern
is ‘non-uniform’ for us to safely tread the muddy track of tenses in English.
Another confusion is
between the tenses for FLY and FLOW
Fly, flew, flown [for
birds] Flow, Flowed, Flowed [for rivers][as per British usage].
Much water has flowed under the bridge;[CORRECT FORM] but
many choose to write Much water
has flown under the bridge [A WRONG
PARTICIPLE AS PER BRITISH CONVENTION].
APOSTROPHE [’] Quite some unwanted dilemma [ or
confusion?] prevails among learners in
using apostrophe. Usually, it denotes whose possession an article is. This is
Gita’s house = The house belongs to Gita. Its gate is damaged. The ‘its’ here
refers to the house; Gita’s is a reference to the house owned by Gita. Though
in both situations [its] and [Gita’s] indicate possession. BUT, APOSTROPHE is
used in respect of Gita, but not for its, though the it here also relates to the house. His, its need not be used with
apostrophe. But many wrongly use apostrophe for ITS and write “it’s” . When
written as it’s, it means either It is or it has as APOSTROPHE is used as
abbreviation for ‘is’ or ‘has.’
In North India
apostrophe is employed indiscriminately. Many signs on display carry
information for some commercial publicity. Even a name like Lewis is written LEWI’S. Some conditioning of mind tells the
user to add [‘] whenever ‘S’ appears in a word. So, the purpose of apostrophe gets defeated by irrational use of it.
SPELLING and
PRONUNCIATION
Another inexplicable
twist in English language relates to the pronunciation in the view of the
spelling.
RENDEZVOUS= Rendevoo,
SUPERFLUOUS= Superfloo
COUGH, TOUGH, ROUGH,
rhyme with cuff, tuff, ruff by the letters G and H, but, THOUGH is not THUFF,
PLOUGH is not PLUFF, and Bluff does not spell BLOUGH, Hand cuff does not spell
HAND COUGH.
Also, CHEF and
PARACHUTE are pronounced –shef AND parashute CH= SH by sound.
MORE TO FOLLOW
Prof. K. Raman